Saturday, June 26, 2010

Say it Aint So Jo


Santana's pitching performances of late are troubling. He hasn't 
pitched well. Santana's location is off and his velocity is down. This 
could spell trouble for The Mets.
For one thing, I'd his inconsistency a result of his off season 
surgery? Is it the wear and tear of his many innings?Can it be a 
result of his well documented off the field distractions?
We don't know, and I am sure Santana doesn't know either.
The point is; The Mets are looking to make a deal for a starting 
pitcher. Now, Santana is not going anywhere. We have our number one 
starter struggling, so if we make a trade what pitcher is out of the 
rotation? Almost any of them is performing more effectively than 
Santana.
My question is this: what are we really gaining by dealing for a 
starting pitcher? Who are we sending ?( it better not be Pagan). There 
just seems to be too many questionable variables to consider.
My take? I say The Mets would be wiser to look for relief help. Right 
now Santana is the weak link in the rotation, so trading for a pitcher 
is a wash. They would be replacing a good pitcher with another good 
pitcher. Relief help is less expensive and a more productive move in 
the long run.
Camille Uliano
METventure@gmail.com

No comments:

Post a Comment